When Does Feedback Help? Auditing Learned Voltage-Clamp Experimental Design
Overview & Synopsis
A learned scientific controller can outperform a misspecified planner without benefiting from feedback. We audit two synthetic voltage-clamp tasks with a training-selected fixed protocol, current masking, a Bayesian reference, and an excluded target. Five recurrent policies repeat one fixed protocol in all 1,200 off-grid rollouts; masking current changes no decision. In a crossed four-hypothesis task, a fixed diagnostic pulse is followed by one learned choice. Policies then use the first current, but tie a correctly specified Bayesian controller, and a fitted threshold reproduces the learned actions without being that controller. The excluded-target prediction gain is $4.6991\times10^{-6}$ nats per sample. Feedback use and protocol quality are separate tests. These cases establish neither biological discovery nor general RL superiority.
arxiv.org)
← / → for pages • + / - for zoom • 0 to fit width
Powered by Mozilla PDF.js v3.11
Document Information
| Document Title | When Does Feedback Help? Auditing Learned Voltage-Clamp Experimental Design |
|---|---|
| Author / Organization | Rayan Nyaupane, Abhiram Bhupatiraju |
| Subject & Discipline | cs.AI |
| Categories | Science & Mathematics |
| Publication Year | 2026 |
| License / Rights | arXiv Open Access / Creative Commons |
| Resource Verification | Listed PDF (Verification Pending) |
| Original Host Website |
arXiv
(arxiv.org)
|
| File Format | application/pdf (Portable Document Format) |
| Language | EN |
| Catalog ID | DOC-271291 |
| Original Source Link | Visit Source Page on arxiv.org » |